I read with some amazement, the stupidity of the turd brigade (politicians – they float in what they talk and are smelly) will never cease to amaze me. Apparently, the British Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson, stated yesterday, 30 December 2018, to the Sunday Telegraph, that “Traditional settler colonies such as Canada and New Zealand, as well as nations right across Africa… look to us to provide the moral leadership, the military leadership and the global leadership. They realize that we are good partners and actually the values that we stand for, of tolerance, democracy and justice, these are the values that they hold dear to their hearts.”
He was speaking of Brexit which is entirely due to Barack Obama’s meddling in British internal affairs by wanting the “remain” vote. That annoyed many enough to vote for Brexit and good riddance to the European Union too. I have news for Mr Williamson, Africans do not look at the former colonial masters for leadership in anything. You have lost your colonies, moral leadership, military leadership and the global leadership decades ago when you got humiliated at the Suez Crisis and even before that. When an Afrikaner, and I am, we remember that the British Army created the Concentration Camp Concept in modern times. Yes, the calamity took place in 1901 and is called genocide by civilised men and a war crime by us. It was during the Second Anglo Boer War of 1899-1902 that the exhausted British Army (they were losing and the war cost them more than any other in their Empire’s history) got desperate. They, under a suspected homosexual called Lord Kitchener invented something called “concentration camps,” yes, they called the places that notorious name. The idea behind it was to deny non-combatant support to the fast-moving Boer Commandoes or Boer Army (irregular cavalry, not Special Forces at all). As a direct result of their “great idea,” the British Army rounded up all the white women and children they could find and murdered (by chance, not choice, it must be said) almost one third of all Afrikaner women and children in the process. No less than any number between thirty and thirty-seven thousand white women and children died in conditions which would again be seen in 1945 in places like Auschwitz. In history thus, concentration camps were a British Army concept and not a German Nazi one. Obviously, it is a damn shameful fact of life which they seem to want to forget about and should be reminded about now and then for their own good.
This aspect will be found in every GMJ Book, simply because the characters as well as I, lost family in those camps. They are not forgotten, even today. The women and children, non-combatants all of them and their many more black servants (no slaves for two generations by that time), died of disease and starvation inside concentration camps where by the laws of war they should not have been in the first place. The Genéve type Conventions, signed by the British Army at the time, prohibited such acts against civilian populations. You have to see the pictures of those victims and you can do so easily by Googling it to understand the ongoing anger. No matter what the British Army intentions were (to deny support to the Boer Commandoes) it happened and unlike what Hillary Clinton thinks, it does matter. We look at concentration camps in some detail in Code Name VET 101. I had apologists writing to me stating all sorts of ridiculous reasons why the British Army cannot be held responsible for their concentration camp crimes. As much as I invite readers to write to me, I really enjoy talking to you, I am not willing to accept apologists on this subject. Therefore, I will answer the arguments in all the books via the briefing and perhaps some sense of objectivity can return since I will not even bother to reply to such letters in the future. I never reveal much of myself in GMJ Books, but I hold post-graduate degrees in law. I have an extensive legal background and practised law for many years. I know what legal arguments will stand and what will be laughed out of court. In this case, the reader was an apologist, most are, to be honest, trying to find excuses instead of facing historical facts and apologise. First, he reckoned that the Pommy soldiers merely followed orders. Hello, Nuremberg War Trials? Not a defence in law, end of story. The British Army could and ought to have refused such orders. Yet, they did not, and we know the consequences even if unforeseen (those were not extermination camps, I say that in all books too, yet, the non-combatants did die, and they died because they were there, end of that argument). Then he said, well, be glad that it was the British Army and not the Germans or Russians you were facing, meaning that things would have gone worse if so. That statement is as good and in law just as stupid as the “we followed orders argument,” to say: “Madame, are you not glad that a white man raped you instead of a black man? It could have been worse, you know? What if he had AIDS?”
There is no standing in law for such an argument besides being factually wrong since it was the British Army, not the Germans, not the Russians, not whoever, British Army, hello? Yes, I am sure that the murdered women and kids felt much better because they were murdered by Pommies and not whoever, a senseless argument. I spoke to Mr Nelson Mandela, the famous statesman when he was still President on another matter entirely. He said to me: “Don’t try to defend the indefensible, you will look like a fool.” I agreed then and I do now. The other endless dispute is that the Nuremberg War Tribunal was “a trial by the victors, revenge only, and thus does not count.” I say a lot of the Nuremberg Trials in my books (trials - there were many, not just for the Nazi bigwigs which most know about). Mistakes were made, no doubt, I have the legal background to point them out and do so but let us not forget that the Allied Nations, the victors, agreed to the trials as the best way to end the Nazi evil. Whatever came from the Nuremberg Trials stands today in law. That part is not under dispute so that is also a senseless argument but by all means read Code Name Dawn where we discuss the International Criminal Court, another pointless institution that should be either supported fully (then every US President from Billy Goat Clinton will be arrested as well as all British Prime Ministers from Tony Blair onward, Angelique) or disbanded as a waste of time and money, which it is. As Mr Mandela said, don’t try to defend what cannot be defended, you will look like a fool and men like me will tell you that you are a fool. Lives do matter, black and white and yes, even a liberal’s although he is not worth the price of a single bullet in my opinion. As far as we are concerned the scroungers in Buckingham Palace bear the ultimate responsibility and guilt (read shame & dishonour) for what their Army did in their name, no matter how long ago. It was a war crime of note and left deep scars which will not be forgiven easily. So much so that the South African Army, to this day, has a standing order to shoot anything wearing khaki (the British soldiers were called Khakis). You don’t need any permission from a commissioned officer to do so and God will not help you if you fail to do so. That is Standing Order One, you learn it at your first day of Army or Police service.
Justice for the slaying of the innocents was done in a small way, I am glad to say. When the most famous Parasite of all, known to you as Queen Victoria, died during the Boer War, it was seen as justice from God. We wish her and her countless siblings breeding in rare fashion all over the “Royal Houses of Europe” everything which is bad and may she join the homosexual Kitchener wherever he is which is not heaven, God will never allow them close or give them peace, we believe this. We grudgingly still await an apology which will never arrive, probably because of fears of being sued as the Kenyans did recently on their so-called abuse during the “Uhuru Uprising” (it was not much of an uprising to be honest, 38 white people died besides 2,000 Africans, in the statistics of war, almost nothing although every life lost is regrettable). Interestingly, we studied the “Uhuru Uprising” in great detail and some South African Police Force members were involved, it is one of the forgotten counterinsurgency wars which the colonials actually won. Being accused of having English blood in your veins was the worst insult an Afrikaner child could endure at school and an immediate reason for a proper fist fight behind the bicycle sheds. Such insults had to be answered with blood and was. You know where you can push up your uncalled-for comments on leadership in Africa. By the way, the British Armed Forces are a military joke today because of the British turd brigade starving them of funding. Read my books and see them exposed to what they are - lackeys of their American cousins and nothing to be proud about - the famous “Runners of Dunkirk” and “Assassins of Mers-el-Kébir.” Let me not even begin to talk about your scandalous lack of casualties during World War Two or the insult to the colonies by stating that you were alone in 1940 when you were not. Nor do we rate Winston S Churchill, the chemical warfare advocate and denier of food for Bengal highly, you know, the 33-degree Satan worshipper you admire so much. But that too is in my books, not your usual OMG school histories.
Without regards or best wishes,