I must wonder how deluded people can get. It is promised in the media that the “environmental activists” will use “guerrilla tactics” to stop the Keystone pipeline project. This should worry you, they have a history of violence and terrorism rated with the best of the better-known terrorist groups. For instance, did you know that even the UN declared Green Peace a terrorist group in 2014? We discussed green terrorism in Code Name Green 41, the name of the book, by the way, as with all GMJ Books, is a code reflecting to my late wife, it has nothing to do with Green Peace or greenies in general. Yet, it was very interesting what my research brought to the surface – GMJ Books are not your usual story books, they are history in motion because we can learn from history.
… “In more recent times we saw the Sierra Incident. She was a whaling vessel attacked in 1980 in Portugal and sunk with a limpet mine. Attached by who? The answer is obvious and note, this was five years before the Rainbow Warrior Incident in New Zealand. This is interesting or should be as it is a study in green terrorism which is applauded by those supporting them as if it is not terrorism and somehow “right”. What the green terrorists did, and this is not disputed by any party, is to activate the “Sierra Campaign” to prevent whaling in international waters. It also became known as the “Sea Shepherd Project” and is frankly astonishing in extremism and naked aggression. A lesson in what a liberal believes is acceptable behaviour under their double standard outlook in life.
A North Sea cod trawler was bought and renamed the Sea Shepherd - some of the funding came from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), an organisation I will never donate to, ever, because of this incident about to be described from a counter terrorism view and not a bleeding heart one. The newly acquired Sea Shepherd, under command of one Paul Watson, now hunted the whaling vessel Sierra, going on her legitimate business on the open seas, not breaking any laws and rammed her deliberately, not once, but twice, tearing open a 7 by 10-foot hole, and thus staving in a long section of the Sierra's port-side hull, causing a lot of damage. This is called piracy by decent people and the Sea Shepherd had a reinforced bow for this purpose – showing complete intent. It was no “accident” but a deliberate act of violence, terrorism and attempted murder.
The attacks caused the Sierra to run for safety in Portugal where she was then limpet bombed, and sunk at her moorings. Again, an act of terrorism and exactly what happened five years later in New Zealand. The legal consequence was that a Portuguese Judge awarded the Sea Shepherd, the ship which caused the damage and her to be where she was moored, to the owners of the Sierra, the attacked vessel. The greenies could not defend this court order and did not even try, they would have been arrested on the spot. Nor would they comply with a court order, very much like what we see with Apple today, refusing flatly for no reason, to unblock the San Bernardino extremist’s iPhone, and so they scuttled Sea Shepherd to avoid handing her over. Another middle finger to law and order and a reason to be arrested.
Less than a few months later half of the Spanish whaling fleet went down. Yes, by the use of limpet bombs planted by saboteurs & green terrorists approaching under water. A bombing campaign thus, the same as any Muslim radical against Israel or against the World Trade Centre, what is the difference? There is none. It stays terrorism even if not state sponsored. You have to be a monumental idiot to applaud such behaviour.
Yet, the greenies, I can tell you, are extremely proud of what took place and see Paul Watson as a hero to this day, why, I have no idea. He is a terrorist as much as Osama Bin Laden is. If he or any one of his hippy mates try that with one of my vessels I will act in kind and they will be trapped in the sinking vessel. Accordingly, there was a long history before the Rainbow Warrior got sunk which is today and then, completely ignored by the greenies and their supporters. It seems to me that liberals like the idea of being nasty to everyone around them and then cry like spoiled brats when tasting their own medicine or are arrested. I am not surprised in the least that so many Greeny Organisations are declared terrorists and are stuck on the FBI Terrorism Watchlist (something they complain bitterly about too). They absolutely deserved to be on such lists (see a history of Greeny terrorism in Code Name Wrangler, if interested, Angelique).” … (Taken from Code Name Green 41.)
Now let us see what we discovered in Code Name Wrangler, the book on hostage rescues, as Angelique advised above.
… “It is one thing to peacefully protest your views on nature and another entirely when you start acting like a hoodlum, no matter how strong your views or how just your cause. When you break the law, designed to keep everyone to common civilised behaviour, you are either a criminal or a terrorist and frequently both. The only difference, theoretically is your wish to further political goals via violence and not at the voting booth. All terrorism is a crime, something most doesn’t get, it is not a military problem but a police one. The line between a protest and civil disobedience and outright terrorism is not thin at all as liberal journalists want you to believe, it is easily discernible in law and in counter terrorism. You look for patterns and you carefully analyse what they do or they stand accused of and you get the picture rather easily. The FBI defines eco-terrorism as “the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against people or property by an environmentally oriented, subnational group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature.”
Eco-terrorism is as bad as Muslim extremists, they caused no less than $200 million in property damage between 2003 and 2008 in the US alone. Often they are seen attacking whalers as well as oilrigs and making a nuisance of themselves to gain media (not so innocent) attention. And when they get attention of the wrong kind from the authorities, they run to their local embassies for assistance instead of taking their well-deserved punishment as a man. They cannot even argue their silly cause properly in my eyes as they have the oddest (they must be liberals in drag) ideas on why they are not or should never be classified as the terrorists their foul deeds indicate they are. Most say they do not perpetrate violence against humans but only against property. This alone, according to their theory, makes them “innocent” but let us look at this more closely. Following this logic to the end, if the World Trade Centre was empty of people, somehow, then the 9/11 attack would be what? Not terrorism? Really? I mean it was only property damage in such a case! A silly argument in the extreme, your deeds are not following your mouth. And what if your acts caused injury or death to humans? They have a common tactic in the US known as tree spiking where they hammer a small iron spike or nail into the trunk of a tree that may be logged in the future. The idea is that the spike or nail will damage the chainsaw or mill blades (this is overcome with x-rays before the tree is sawed). However, any idiot will know that such a nail may very well seriously injure the logger as the blade explodes in his face. What then? Silence, oops and anyway, the hardworking logger had it coming, the tree must die of old age. No wooden furniture must ever be made and you know what, America would not have been discovered since a good many trees got murdered most foully to build the Santa Maria and other ships. Yep, that is what greenies stand for, no progress, it is unbiblical.
Another favourite tactic used by the eco-terrorist is arson. They now attack sites such as new housing developments, SUV dealerships, and chain stores with incendiary devices. What if someone dies in such an attack or because of such an attack? Obviously the liberal twat will then say it was an “accident” and not planned and in any case a “maverick” attack, not the organisation’s fault. And they do operate like that, plausible deniability. They follow the classic independent cells which operate on its own. The same modus operandi usually used by spies in occupied countries. They also say, seriously, that they have no central leaders or formal organisational structures (which can be banned, sued or the leaders arrested). Those who wish to join the “movement” are encouraged to start their own cell, and never to seek out other members and jeopardize their secrecy. The same as the current Al-Qaeda and ISIS organisations are doing.
Now why is that? The answer is logical. Statistics available, from the FBI, show us that 23 serious injuries and three deaths through letter-bombs were caused by so called independently operating eco-terrorists in the last twenty years. This is besides the millions of dollars of damage. What is more, the FBI reckons that eco-terrorists represented “one of the most serious domestic terrorism threats in the U.S. today.” They are rated right there with the Muslim extremists. Several comparable organisations are on the FBI “Terrorism Watchlist” besides Greenpeace itself. The FBI list includes the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), the Earth Liberation Front, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and last but not least, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Them you often see with blood smeared models protesting the fur trade. They have wide support, the liberals, scared to lose their income and status among fellow idiots called tree huggers, protested this “terrible injustice” of being watched by the FBI through their cronies in Congress and the Senate. Fortunately, you will have to go far to meet two more useless and toothless houses in the world, they cannot even stop a president’s illegal pen never mind what other countries are up to. And the greenies are not that respected in all parts of the world and with good reason, they act like hooligans and terrorists at times.
We can take Greenpeace, the richest and most famous of the many eco-organisations, as the classic example. They started off well, with good ideas and then became aware that bully boy tactics and publicity stunts are great money spinners. Recently, in Peru, they screwed up so badly with a “publicity stunt” that their fellow leftist whiners at the UN (2014) declared Greenpeace a “terrorist organisation.” Strangely, or perhaps not, the US Justice Department did not act on the well-known UN vote. If they did, they would have immediately revoked Greenpeace’s status regarding tax exemption and frozen all their considerable assets as I absolutely guarantee you, would happen to a “Tea Party” organisation under similar circumstances. The Greenpeace directors grovelled to Peru since then like you cannot believe and offered money as compensation to no avail. They even wanted to send a Director (he must be related to the Pope) to talk to them, the country flatly stated any such Director will be arrested and put on trial for terrorism on arrival and obviously, not one arrived. What will happen further no one knows except that the Greenpeace twats will become more radical because they got away with their tactics up to now.” … (Taken from Code Name Wrangler.)
Thus, you may want to take note that if such terrorists threats are made by people with a clear history of terrorism, it must be taken seriously. Do not become a terrorist and break laws just because you think you have a moral obligation, it is the road to jail if lucky and death if not. Use the courts, protest peacefully, and be aware, you are not doing your cause in favours by committing terrorist acts. You will be treated as one.
You must laugh when you see the Clinton Whitewash Bureau (FBI to you) testifying with a suitably serious face, that they have no evidence of wiretapping regarding Donald J Trump. Let me explain, these things do not always happen legally. You would like to think they do, that a Judge is involved, all the paperwork nicely sorted etc. and if you think so, well, carry on living in your dream world. In Code Name Oath 19, a book which is about deep technical dives, 300 feet under the water, from submarines to recover intelligence (thus maritime reconnaissance) we discussed this aspect – allow me to quote for you and you will understand my mirth: -
… “Most certainly not.” Angelique confirmed. “We don’t trust cables or anything outside our heads.”
You would be silly to think that underwater cables are safe from spies. Not at all, in history we saw many clandestine missions to intercept them. The best-known example is probably a US operation near the Kuril Islands off the eastern coast of Russia. They called it Operation Ivy Bells where a nuclear attack boat sailed in and with the help of divers, they dropped waterproof recording pods on the lines. Later they would be back to gather the recording tapes. The happy times ended in 1981. Sadly, it was found out that the operation was betrayed by one Ronald Pelton, a NSA (No Such Agency, by God) analyst to the KGB not long after the recordings started. Of course, everyone intercepts everyone else, make no mistake, it is not only the US and today the Internet communications (undersea cables) are subjected to the same treatment. It is said that 21,000,000 (yes, million, Angelique) gigabytes per day is “harvested” and then analysed by some 550 NSA and GCHQ (the British codebreakers) analysts. Clearly, it is an impossible task to do this properly, you cannot go through such data in one day. No matter what computer search programs are used, looking for specific words like “attack, bomb, president” etc. (see Code Name OST-M where we discussed this in detail) they will never be able to go through even 8% of what they have. The entire collection system has gone crazy, it is entirely inefficient in results and almost a waste of time. History repeats here. The same happened during World War Two - the number of intercepts by far outweighed what could be broken in time to be useful (as well as what could be released to safeguard the code breaking security, Angelique). In modern America, the inefficiency is proved by the attacks that get through on mainland America and Western Europe. Unless you gain meaningful intelligence able to prevent attacks and giving a fair picture of your enemies, you are a snooper, a collector and breaking the law for no known reason. In this game results actually count, it is not an MBA solution of spending money for no known reason. I want results and so should you reading here or your family may well die in the next attack. A mate of mine wrote a book on defending yourself against such an attack (Terrorist Takedown - Jacobus Kotze - ASIN B01GYDBHLM) in which he predicted a terrorist attack once every 3 months in the US. This is serious, if your fences are not in order, or you are seen as weak, you will be attacked.
Now you may ask, what is intercepted? Everything, absolutely everything, phone calls, email messages, Facebook entries and the complete history of all searches done by you on Google or other search engines. According to Edward Snowden, not a hero in my eyes but one whose revelations can be chronicled: “Well, if you had the choice, you should never send information over British lines or British servers. Even the Queen's selfies with her lifeguards would be recorded, if they existed.” He was referring to what the Brits call Tempora, their secret interception program done from GCHQ (their codebreakers). NSA call their cable interception program by various names, Oakstar, Stormbrew, Blarney and Fairview. Nothing you do online or over the airwaves is safe from interception, nothing, make peace with that. Even if you write to me, and you are always welcome, it will be intercepted by your agencies. Surveillance became an industry of cover-your-ass and not much more. Human intelligence, the old-fashioned way, is still the best, the most reliable and the quickest, yet, this is something which modern Western Agencies are sadly lacking in, they are spending on technology, the statistics look good, the results are piss poor. (What is more, when the War on Terror kicked off, the Virginians (CIA) arrived with unlimited dollars everywhere. They would throw millions of cash to everyone and the result? You cannot now cross check anything because every shyster and his mate became informants, only talking to the money whilst every counter intelligence officer knows, or ought to know from history, that true informants are seldom interested in money. The new wave are selling bare faced lies with their souls and getting away with it, the much more useful ideological informants, were ignored. The spy market was closed to the rest or almost so, hence now MI6, useless as they are, is struggling to collaborate what informant X said, it is a mess and the MBA Solution was found in mass electronic intercepts. The idea was thus: “We spend x amount and collected y intercepts, hoorah! We are collecting entire countries data and our allied heads of state too, hoorah!” I will fire anyone’s ass if the above is given to me as a solution and tapping allied heads of state is insane, it will annoy them. The question should be, and it is most certainly not asked enough: “Show me the results?” Spending blindly and collecting blindly is not the solution, it is a technical showcase but so what? Where are the results? Overly broad non-targeted collecting aids the terrorist and annoys your friends. Yet, such practical thinking is of no use for intelligence fiefdoms. For the Directors battling for ever more funding, the hard work to get results are unimportant, they want to dazzle and bullshit for even more money. Thus they are taking the easy road, collecting even more unusable information and storing it somewhere in massive databases, it is not intelligence, and making their own mess even bigger. I know that this is abused as a weapon against the West by the terrorists. And believe me, the Virginians get seriously upset when you point out what should be logical to everyone reading here, Angelique.) I pity my American friends and readers, not only are they abused as taxpayers and I don’t know any that are not taxpayers, we don’t admire snowflakes, they are also subjected to terrorist attacks, fed mushrooms and treated as morons by the mainstream media and turds (politicians, they float in what they talk).
There are ways and means to tap underwater cables - there are close to 550,000 miles of them – the “regeneration points” where the signals are amplified are targeted by the spy agencies. This is where the best tapping takes place and such points are everywhere and then there is where these cables emerge from the oceans onto land - a choking point you can take for granted is being monitored by the country on whose territory the cables are. Everyone helps each other with the worldwide gathering and sent the information, it is not workable intelligence, to the NSA. It is said and I certainly believe it, that the Australians, New Zealanders, and Canadians are actively supporting the US and their lapdog, the UK in this, all highly illegally so. (And so do the BRICS countries, using the same intercept probes, they capture data by using light through a prism. You will never be in the know that it happened since no tapping evidence is left behind, no physical signs. This information is shared and it is vast, have no doubt. Hence, your own cables are also tapped at will. In South Africa, between 2004 and 2016 more than 3 million intercepts were done by my Service, of them, only 234 were authorised by a High Court Judge, the rest were illegal. It is laughable when the small South African intelligence budget – about $450 million per year is stated as a reason that it cannot happen at this scale. Think about it, who says the South African Government is paying for this? Wake up, look at the MI6 & CIA modus operandi in terms of joint operations, the CIA pays, the Brits beg them for funding. South Africa does not beg, the main role players here are eager to pay for access, we know how to drive hard bargains, Angelique.) … (Taken from Code Name Oath 19.)
Well, there you have it, I will make a prediction here – the illegal tapping of the Trump Campaign will come out in the future. Mr Obama will shrug and deny that he had any knowledge, and the usual politics will continue. But if you wish to read real dynamite, wait for the latest GMJ Book, Code Name Jen, to come out. You will not believe how racism and greed bit the US & UK in the ass in Iraq & Afghanistan, it caused an enormously successful espionage mission against them, run by the South Africans.
The US & UK announced a cabin ban on electronics, from laptops to iPads, Kindles and Nintendo 3DS game consoles on commercial aircraft coming in from mostly Muslim countries yesterday. Such devices must now be put in the cargo hold, probably inside bomb proof containers. Now the words “bomb proof” must be read as “blast resistant” and not seen as bunker or something similar - the containers are lined with membranes made of highly classified material, probably Kevlar, to contain blasts. If you have seen, and you can look at YouTube, what an explosion inside an aircraft looks like, you will be too scared to fly. The best way is still to find the explosives before they get onboard and that also stays the problem, the ones protecting you are lowly paid virtually untrained security guards depending on dicey technology (X-rays) to scan the baggage. Yet, that is a topic for another day. I recently wrote and published a book on counter maritime terrorism, called Code Name Caribbean, the logical follow-up on a previous book called Code Name Willow Bay where a unique method of re-taking a ship, even a warship, was described. For many reasons the usual storming by fast rubber duck / semi-rigids and or helicopter fast roping will not work against a well-trained terrorist group or a warship (intelligence vessel protected by Special Forces). The assault teams will be murdered and that is why I called the recent River Thames Exercise “Mickey Mouse” in public, much to the aggro of a few liberals. Yet, let me be clear, I rate the British Royal Marine SBS much higher than the SAS when it comes to counter maritime terrorism, higher than the US Navy SEALs and Delta Detachment as I know them. In fact, in Code Name Willow Bay, we describe the SBS attack on an Argentine intelligence vessel, the ARA Narwal – let me quote the passage, it is interesting:
… “They are under control but you know how it is, we work in sections and this is a private affair. Foxtrot…” She waited to make eye contact with me “this is beyond Top Secret or Black Ops classification. I am planning a strategic intervention I am not talking about but I must be sure of my facts before presenting it to the Cabinet next year. I must know that it is doable and this jump is part of it and especially hijacking a ship at sea. I want to see for myself how it is done. That is if it even can be done as I am not too sure but history says it can be done. And because it is in planning stage it is a private affair.”
She sounded rather serious immediately making me worried about her safety. I knew then she would not back out, she was going to jump whether I liked it or not. I mentioned what I knew about such things, it falls under counter maritime terrorism or anti-piracy.
“It is damn easy to capture a ship at sea with Special Forces. It first happened during the Falklands War... members of the British Special Boat Squadron boarded an Argentine spy vessel from helicopters, they fast roped down on to the deck. The US Navy SEALs as well as the French Marine Commando Hubert are the leading experts at this. And so are South African Army Special Forces and many others. Even the British Special Air Service is able to do so via their Boat Troop and Air Troop although not nearly as well as the Special Boat Squadron lads. This is not new…it can be done and is done daily in the Persian Gulf in enforcing the oil embargo against Iran. Why do you need to prove a concept which is old news?”
“You are talking, except for the Argentine attack which was on the ARA Narwal, of counter maritime terrorism, Foxtrot. I mean a defended vessel which does not want to be boarded and have trained Special Forces operatives on board to prevent such an attack. Not civilian sailors unable to properly resist and unwilling to do so too. I need to understand if it can be done despite highly efficient operators guarding the target ship. I am not talking about taking a pondering oil tanker with perhaps twenty-five fat crew members on board.”
It was only years later which I fully understood her questions. She was planning an operation whereby the South Africans will find, trap, board and expose “mother ships” where MI6 held snatched radicals. The idea was that such political humiliation will lead to two things: (1) Extreme embarrassment for the Brits and their mates the Yanks and that they will then never attempt covert snatch operations near the Southern Africa coast again and (2) make South Africa the hero of every Muslim Radical in existence, in other words, their old mates. It would have protected the Radicals for many years and she came extremely close in succeeding. Only her defection stopped it with Egg Breaker assistance but we were very close in losing when she took command to undo her master plan (Code Name Pour Angelique). This is how that plan came into being and the methods used later in this book has never been revealed before or used by any other Special Forces Unit known to me.
She went on not waiting for me to think too much. “That attack on the ARA Narwal took place on 9 May 1982. British Sea Harriers from HMS Hermes, the baby carrier, first hit it with a thousand-pound bomb which did not explode. On the face of it it was released too low and too close and like the Argentine bombs failed to explode. Something we don’t hear about today, it is only the Argentine Air Force who are derided for pressing their attacks too purposely. Nonetheless the bomb still caused heavy damage and the trawler was then strafed by returning Sea Harriers. As the Royal Navy found out, none-exploding bombs can still sink a warship, they are not armoured in the sense of massive steel plates as they used to be up to the end of the Second World War. No modern warship is, including carriers, they are extremely vulnerable to any attack which gets through the layered defences.
The Harrier jets were coming back from an aborted bombing run and when they found her by chance and they opened up using their 30-mm cannon to good effect. She was defenceless, it must be said, but also equipped for ELINT purposes and shadowing the Royal Navy and so open for destruction. It was not a war crime as some idiot journalists in London of all places maintained for years afterwards. Then the next day two Sea King helicopters flew to it and the Special Boat Squadron fast roped down and by capturing the ship, made history. They got the crew rounded up and much valuable intelligence though I believe it was not nearly that valuable as said at the time. Overall it had no influence on the war and was a side show.”
I answered thinking back on the incident which made headline news. “Yeah, it was not much of a capture to be honest. The Royal Marines fast roping down would have landed in the icy water if an Argentine crew member did not grab the rope and held it for the Royal Marines to land on the heaving deck. He was probably thinking they are to be rescued, not attacked as this never happened before in that part of the world. In addition, not a shot was fired by either side so the ship was not defended. I know about the incident... we studied it at great lengths to see if we could improve on it. The 'first capture ever' statements were just propaganda by a patriotic press needing something to brag and write about. It was not a big deal at all in our world, tactically. However, the lads did not know that, that the Argies would not shoot at them and hence it took considerable guts for the pilots also. We have to give them credit.”
“And the next day the vessel sunk in heavy seas or so they say anyway. So, can you improve on it?” She asked in return still staring at me for more answers and detailed ones.
I kept silent for a few minutes before answering. “Retrospection is one hell of a thing, Mrs Dawson. The short answer is no and the boarding Marines were lucky in my view. The Argentines in effect assisted them and did not oppose the boarding at any stage. Helicopters can easily be shot down when at close range when without helicopter gunship support as they were in that incident. You simply cannot do that and get away with it. It will not work to use the same tactics against a vessel which is defended or a proper warship able to shoot at you. Even fast roping at night is problematic these days, the assaulters will be spotted and shot dead before they even hit the deck. Everyone now knows about that technique and it is entirely possible to rig other nasty surprises like claymores waiting for them and or to shore up the hatches etc. I am not sure if helicopter assaults without gunship support are possible. And then the two, the gunship and the helicopter, have to be reasonably close to launch and have no interference with enemy fighter jets or helicopter gunships. What happened with the Narwal was unique and unlikely to be repeated. Because it was the first such an attack it was pulled off. I doubt if it will happen again.” (Taken from Code Name Willow Bay.)
From the above came the Willow Bay Method on insertion but you can read the book yourself. During Code Name Caribbean, we took a good look at what happens when say a passenger liner is taken by terrorists, or a LNG ship, able to explode with the same power as 55 Hiroshima atomic bombs and quite a few things came out in the research. Let me quote again, from Code Name Caribbean:
… “Sir John, you do know that there was something special about the Taj Mahal attack?” Angelique asked directly, staring at the man. “Relating to Code Name Caribbean?”
“Please tell me, Mrs Dawson. We spoke to our counterparts in India after the attack, some of our citizens were trapped in the hotel and so we were interested. Not much came out of the meeting. They seemed more concerned about their long time running battle with Pakistan and China, oddly so, since both India and China are part of BRICS these days. You would have thought they kissed and made up for their own sake since China sorted them out in the 1960s. And I got the idea they dislike us. What did they tell you?”
The one nice thing about the BRICS Pact, long being dismissed by the rest of the world as nonsense, is that all intelligence is shared a lot more or less openly. Now if you look again at the world map on where the BRICS countries are, you will find them controlling to a large degree Africa via Angelique’s networks, the southern Americas with Brazil, India in the Sub-Continent and of course, Russia and China where they are and the West is not. This is not a small alliance in any sense of the word, really not, look again and read my briefing. The cosy liaison is something like the “special relationship” America has with their lapdog, the UK and entirely odd since none of these countries speak the same home language (so we all speak English when we meet, Angelique). Sir John, with his high-sounding title and BBC Hooligan accent and general f-you attitude towards his “lessors” would not have gone down well with the Indians, a proud nation.
Once again, racism plays a role here, you say “India” and everyone thinks “slums” and there it ends with perhaps a condescending view of Indian computer engineers settling in droves in the US. In fact, they have fairly good armed forces and always did, traditionally, including ten times more Gurkhas than what the British Army has left. Without the Indian Army, Montgomery would have lost the war in North Africa, and later General Mark Clark, in Italy. They have in their navy, a large navy, the ex-Royal Navy baby carriers and like the Chinese and Russians (BRICS nations) to big fleet carriers, good submarines including a nuclear powered one they bought from Russia, advanced fighter jets (mixture between Russia, France and home-grown) in their Air Force. You may add a large mechanised army to the above including paratroopers and good Special Forces Units. They are also nuclear armed and have the capability to deliver those bombs where they want to deliver them, accurately, unlike Pakistan that is still back in the 1940s with delivery systems. Yes, you would be foolish to dismiss that what you don’t understand or studied.
They lost the Sino-Indian War in 1962 against China quite badly as Sir John pointed out, it was fought at 14,000 feet in the Himalayas, probably the highest altitude war in history. After that, they learned to consider China as an aggressor nation, not a fellow anti-colonialist power. Many Indians say the war started because they granted asylum to the Dalai Lama when the 1959 Tibetan uprising ended, I believe that uncalled for interference played a major role in Chinese thinking. Years later, in 2014, the very same Dalai Lama wanted to visit South Africa to attend a summit of Nobel peace laureates, he was here before without problems. This time the new lot refused him a visa, that is how far China is respected and even though the liberals cried and gnashed their teeth in a media furore, he stayed outside the country. I think that is when many realised what the new South Africa had become, luckily, we were long gone by then, the Egg Breaker War winding down in an uneasy truce they kept to, thus far.
More curiously for the student of military history, after the Chinese overran the Indians in the disputed territory, they moved back, withdrawing their forces, having proved their point. In 1979, they did the same by invading Cambodia and then a unified Vietnam, striking hard and withdrawing when the mission was accomplished. Here many Western analysts said they saw their arses, but that too is disputed, the fact is they did what they said they would do and moved back, not getting themselves sucked into a counter insurgency campaign and no one followed them to their home country like no one, up to now, followed the US home. We can learn from this and make some deductions - it seems that they wanted to punish those not willing to listen politely to suggestions. They also warned Vietnam’s chief ally, the Soviet Union, that if they wish to help Vietnam by invading China in the rear, a full scale conventional war will break out. The Soviets left Vietnam to its fate as China placed the entire Soviet border on a war footing. Today China is flexing its muscles, moving out and quietly taking over and their modus operandi has changed completely. They are now moving on to conquer. What they take, like Tibet decades before, they keep, they are expanding. Hitler did the same for years. We are in the Chinese Appeasement years currently. History is repeating and China is so much more powerful than Hitler ever was that they can afford to be arrogant, and, they have a worldwide safety block known as BRICS supporting them. These are not American liberals thinking next election the morning after being sworn in and damn their country, they are working slowly and methodically and will trouble the world in the future. Angelique went on to explain what the Indians told her. It was fascinating to see how she brought the pieces together. All good spymasters do so, they have brains like a tree full of owls and this one an entire forest, she never forgets. It can be maddening at times when she quotes you, word for word, twenty-nine years later, on what you said offhandedly three decades earlier.
“Yep, my Indian connections told me a couple of things of interest. As we often say counter terrorism is international, so is the terrorism. An American Pakistani, David Headley, made the first reconnaissance for the attackers, several times, he even took videos and got GPS references on where to attack. Because he held an American passport and his previous names were not reflected on it, he got into India rather easily. He was never a suspect under the then terrorism radars. Such radars are anyway crap, mostly wrong. Since then they stopped trusting American passports and you may say, so what, but that brought them closer to China. Exactly what the US does not want, another foreign affairs failure.”
“So what happened to him?” I asked curiously. “This Pakistani, born in America to be a Muslim terrorist?”
“He was arrested in the US and plead guilty to the terrorism charges, he broke easily and started talking, so he got a mere 35 years. India is still fuming, they want him extradited to be executed and all US passports changed to show prior names. I fully understand that aspect but it is highly unlikely to happen, human rights and all that crap, the right to forget, I suppose. Sadly, we know this aspect is abused, US passports, and you don’t read about it in the news, no, it is always the North African and Middle East variety which are looked at with such scepticism.” She looked straight at Sir John nursing his drink moodily. “Why is that Sir John? Tell me why your esteemed nephews across the pond don’t take anything seriously which we tell them?”
“Racist beliefs, narrow-mindedness and a lack of clarity from the liberal publishers controlling the internet and news agencies. If they publish anything else, they are seen as racists or sell-outs by the Johnny-do-good club. You cannot afford to be a conservative these days, you are automatically seen as a horrible person.” He waved his arms, clearly annoyed. “I am older than you two colonials, a generation before you I would say, in thinking. I see a new generation after you, the ‘entitlement generation’ as I call them. They are what they read in the newspapers and see on the internet. And what they read are totally distorted to bring about a social liberal revolution, sadly, it is working. Take for example gay sex, a very minute part of society you would think, on average 96.5% of the population is not gay. We used to look down on such things or at least kept such acts behind closed doors for decency sake if nothing else, but since the Internet arrived to stay, you can do a Google search and find 66 million hits in less than a second with an explanation that you can do with your body what you please. That is why our youth are confused, they are not cynical enough yet, it comes with age to be cynical, you need to be hurt because you trusted your leaders, first. And so young minds are formed by what they see and are exposed to, that is how the Muslim extremists get their recruits, people like this David Headley, a former heroin smuggler of all things. And the West just don’t get that there are new kids on the block, countries which became powerful in their own right in the last two decades. They believe their own propaganda and have a most definite agenda. By the time they receive your warnings, they dismiss them because of the above views, who cares what an African Agency says, we ‘know’ they cannot be any good!”
Angelique nodded, she held similar views and kept a very sharp eye on what our twins did on the Internet. Knowledge can be abused, what you see in porn is not real, or a loving relationship, it is acting and disgusting. It takes more than a few grunts to make a good marriage, it takes the presence of God in your house and a lifetime of commitment from all sides.
“Yes, true, my warnings are often ignored. But David Headley is not all what came out of the Taj Mahal attack investigations, it gets worse. Those men, the terrorists, were originally trained in marine warfare at a remote camp in the mountainous Muzaffarabad region, some say at the Mangla Dam reservoir. This included specialised commando tactics training and marine navigation. Why is that, Sir John?”
“Marine navigation? That includes ship handling, it is a broad concept, to take a seagoing ship, what else can it be. Why the hell did they not tell me? We always look for patterns, and we find them and then we see them recruiting former Merchant Marine officers. And I will tell you something else, Mrs Dawson, that particular terrorist group was trained by ‘retired’ personnel of the Pakistan Army, yes, fairly advanced weapons and explosives courses. And it will happen again, it is a matter of time.” He sounded grim and suddenly looked his age, about twenty years on us, a delightful sight, the old goat. (Taken from Code Name Caribbean.)
The above, it happened, shows that terrorists are now trained to take ships and you may wonder, seen in the light of the ban on the electronic goods, what explosives can do to an aircraft or a ship – let me explain, again by quoting from Code Name Caribbean”
… “She took her time answering. “Which is why we get on board and in control before they know we are there. To answer you, we looked at history, Sir John. We know that any ship will sink if uncontrollable flooding takes place, that is not what we envisage in this scenario, we wanted to know the least amount of explosives ever used sinking a large vessel. The amount you may expect to carry concealed aboard. I know military and commercial explosives. I am considered to be an artist with any type of explosives and so are most of us sitting here, we are all demolition experts. Yet, the answer, from history, stunned me and will surprise you.”
I observed the rest calmly, I knew what she was about to say and it would shock anyone. I was shaking my head and checked the research twice.
Angelique explained further, talking softly and intensely. “In addition, I am quite sure that we can smuggle explosives onto a cruise ship, easily. Cruise ship security in general sucks everywhere. As an example, we found that in the Philippines, their Coast Guard put two guardsmen on board each ferry after the Superferry 14 disaster, an incident we will talk about in great detail just now. One of those Coast Guard men got off and returned with a girlfriend. When the ship’s security told him to pay for her ticket, he went to his cabin for his firearm, returned and killed the ferry company's security man. Now why was his firearm in his damn cabin? And why did he want his whore with him when on duty? This is pitiable and yes, you may say ‘Third World’ as you always do and dismiss the lessons learned. Yet, worse things have happened in the so called First World countries where security is in general lax. We know, because we did so, that we can smuggle anything into any Western country almost at will. Ironically, you know much less about physical security than us for the reason that for many decades you had no need to worry about terrorism, you worried about crime only. You never had an enemy, a determined one, following you home after bombing and sort of fighting them in faraway places before withdrawing, leaving your allies to surrender. Since almost always, the US fought her wars at someone else’s property, now it has changed. They and you, are facing a domestic terrorism threat. Statistics show that the US will have a Muslim radical terrorist attack twice a year from sleeper agents inside the place, I think this will become the new normality. You have lone wolf attacks currently; it will escalate to wolf packs as more and more combine in causing greater damage. We, on the other hand, lived with terrorism as does Israel to this day, since we were born. You are only starting out, you have no clue even how to get to our standards and way of thinking, you also have too many liberals tying your hands down, weak police and wretched SWAT units. Innocents will pay for this, yes, they will. We are getting tired of not being listened to, Sir John, the day you have a 1,000 against 1 combat killing rate on terrorists and maintain that for two decades, that is when you are at our level in counter insurgency and terrorism. Until then, carry on dying needlessly.”
They stared at her fascinated but she got quiet, a sign that she was getting annoyed, you lean in to hear further and she smacks you. Truth to be told, we were getting fed up with the intrinsic racism which made our advice less than valuable. I took over. History, is something I love talking about. We can learn from history and here we learned a great deal, even if from the “Third World.”
“Maritime terrorism is not a major problem or never used to be and note, we are not talking piracy now, we are talking terrorism. The incidents are less than 1% of all terrorism but mark my words, that is about to change. They are waking up to the fact that 80-90% of the world’s trade is by ship, whoever controls the oceans, is the super power of the era. The Royal Navy, with its coaling stations and worldwide fleet, is the perfect example in history. When you still had a navy and an Empire, the preferred tactic you used, Sir John, with much success, was blockade. That was your standard answer to every problem in life when not murdering women and children in concentration camps or shooting at African tribesmen with Maxim machine guns. Almost 100,000 Germans starved to death after the November 11, 1918 Armistice because the Royal Navy did not lift the blockade until 17 January 1919.”
“Aide Toi, Et Dieu T'Aidera!” (French, God helps those who help themselves) I muttered to Angelique before continuing with the briefing, ironically, that was the slogan for the Confederate ship, the CSS Alabama, she did help herself to many prizes. “The smallest amount of explosives known to sink a large ship took place in 2004 in the Philippines, the ship was called SuperFerry 14, a 10,192-ton vessel. She sailed from Manila, fully loaded. As far as could be established, 8-pounds of explosives, hidden in a television set below decks, exploded. A fire then started, got out of control, and she sank in shallow waters, laying on her side. No less than 116 people died, Captain, making this attack the world's deadliest terrorist attack at sea.”
“Eight pounds? And it sunk a 10,000-ton ferry? One equipped with modern firefighting apparatus? What type of explosives?” Captain Thomas inquired incredulously.
Sir John was way too angry yet to speak sense, our meetings often end like that, and so he silently and broodily stared into the air. Much to his regret he needed Angelique Dawson more than what she needed him, the extremists are in Africa, we see them, we identify them since they stick out. And no Western Intelligence Agency is functioning well here, they make fools of themselves every now and then. No matter how many insults were traded between us, he would be back, shrugging us off and carrying on in his superior way which is the only way he knows. That too shows rare professionalism, he did not let past affronts bother him for long. He knew, as did we, that history has more than one side to it, it really depends where you stand and he knew that what you are taught at school is often written to make a turd look good. As with all such arguments, both sides had good points and unless you know history well, you cannot possibly comprehend the value in it. Astonishing, very nearly 50% of Britons for instance do not know the Battle of the Somme took place in World War One. They do not even know the most basic history, military strategy or anything else except to collect their benefits checks.
“Type of explosives used? In the Superferry 14 incident they used commercial TNT, not military grade C-4 or Semtex as expected. Not that it matters, TNT is powerful enough and the standard against which the R.E. factor is measured. It is clear the ship did not go down because of the initial explosion, I mean it did not directly sink her, but the fire afterwards did, she was utterly burned out. Yet, this goes back to the bomb and what is worrying here, Captain, is that any cruise ship passenger carries more luggage than 8 pounds aboard. You would know that the average baggage load on cruise ships, officially allowed for each passenger, is 100 pounds spread in two large suitcases. That is slightly more than 12 times more than the 8-pound bomb that led to the sinking of SuperFerry 14. It can be smuggled aboard easily. And you do not use explosive sniffer dogs effectively when screening the bags, time constraints, turnaround times is more important. Nor are your dogs fully trained.”
The man was frowning, trying to follow me. Angelique clarified what I meant, smiling, she loves explosives and the science behind them. I don’t, I know how to operate them efficiently and that is it, I am a demolitions expert, she and Geelslang are also bomb disposal officers, you combine the two fields and you have artists with explosives and they do get the science (then why always cheating me out of demolitions on the Ukuthula Ranch, Angelique).
“Foxtrot, you are confusing the Captain, he is not an explosives expert like us. He was a Navigational officer in the Royal Navy, not a Gunnery officer. We measure the explosive's demolition power by the relative effectiveness factor, or R.E. factor against TNT. This means we start at a factor of 1 which is TNT at 1 kilogram or 2.2 pounds. As an example, Black Powder would be 0.55 in R.E. terms, that translates to using almost double the same amount of Black Powder to get to what TNT will produce. Semtex is 1.35 and C-4 is 1.34, both are more powerful than TNT, with Semtex winning slightly. But, as my colleagues will now point out, with plastic explosives we can create shape charges, bringing the effectiveness of the explosion up by several factors. Today, Octanitrocubane (ONC) would be the most powerful chemical, non-nuclear explosives, at a 2.34 R.E. factor. It is simple mathematics really, to work out what will happen when it detonates.”
“You people are dangerous. I don’t want any explosives on my ship. Why was SuperFerry 14 not able to contain the fire? She must have been old or something!” Captain Thomas was politer in words than in thought, he clearly thought the crew screwed up in some way and he is not alone in that thought, many other do so also including me.
I admitted my own thoughts. “That ship was fully equipped to deal with fires, emergencies and the crew certified in all aspects, they worked for a decent company, not a fly-by-night outfit. Nevertheless, they only lost 2 crew members out of 155, that says a lot to me. I have to deduct that they fled first and did not try that hard to save the ship or the passengers. Certainly such accusations were made by the unimpressed survivors. No doubt the authorities also did not act quickly nor decisively, it took them months to get them to admit it was a terrorist attack and to recover bodies from the burned out hulk. In the end only 4 bodies were recovered from the ferry during the first week. As time went on they got another 63 bodies, 12 displayed clear signs of a bomb exploding close to them.”
“It would not have happened like that on a British ship!” Sir John finally muttered. “We will not let a fire destroy us just like that!”
Angelique responded directly to him. “Maybe not, Sir John, maybe not, I believe in British crews but this is what history tells us, an 8-pound TNT bomb led to a 10,000-ton ferry being sunk. Such a device can be carried aboard at any time by any passenger and as Foxtrot pointed out, your so called security measures at boarding sucks. The Muslim extremist Abu Sayyaf terrorist group claimed responsibility, they planted the bomb because they were not paid protection money, they wanted $1 million from the owners. Technically, this makes it a crime, not terrorism as such but the fact remains, she sunk with what can be carried on board in hand luggage almost. I know I am repeating myself, but that is the problem we have. With the bad security measures when passengers board, and also the crew members, anyone can smuggle such explosive on board. Now, if a terrorist boards via fast rubber ducks without a ticket or even the most basic security screening done at port, you can bet your ass he will be able to carry more than that amount of explosives with him. So the cut off is 8-pounds of TNT, that can sink a ship.”
The naval officer, I found out later he was called “Maceo” which may be a nickname or not, I don’t know, joined the conversation, studiously ignoring Sir John. “It is the luck of the draw, Captain, if given half a chance, a good crew will fight the damage to their ship. We saw with the USS Cole attack in 2000, that they fought the fire and flooding for three days nonstop before they won through. Then you get what happened to the Pan Am flight, going down over Lockerbie in 1988… do you know how much Semtex was used to bring her down with 270 dead because of the tragedy? Two pounds or less, 32 ounces! There was nothing that the crew could do to save their aircraft and passengers, nothing. They fell to their deaths as did the passengers. The aircraft broke up, and they fell for several minutes, they did not die of the explosion. One airhostess was found alive on the ground, but died shortly after. The local pathologist report concluded that at least two first class passengers, still strapped to their seats in the nose section, laying on its side with the cockpit, would have lived if rescuers got to them quickly enough. It is a horrifying idea to their families (some reports say only two pounds of Semtex were used, Angelique).”
I was also ignoring Sir John, the old goat, focussing on Captain Thomas. “The USS Cole attack was, however, different than the Superferry 14 attack in many ways. The amount of explosives used was anything between 400 to 700 pounds of shaped charges, coming from the outside, not internally like SuperFerry 14. This was a genuine terrorist attack and the small boat carrying the explosives used as a torpedo or a fire ship if you wish to go back in naval history, same method. Two terrorists vaporised with the explosion, and 17 US Navy sailors died, 39 were injured. That she survived is a miracle almost, the explosives created a massive 40-foot hole in her side. The crew really did well. Likewise, the attack changed the rules of engagement, you approach a warship today with such a small craft, they will open fire on you to keep you away. But make no mistake, it happened afterwards again against commercial vessels, most oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, probably the most heavily defended piece of water on earth. Such an attack will get through, in my opinion, against a commercial ship. Of course, it is not as serious from a counter terrorism viewpoint when a commercial ship is attacked like that, there is no hostages, the ship will be damaged and sunk, or not, but we will not be involved.”
“We assisted them, the first naval ship on the scene was HMS Marlborough, a Type 23 frigate. She had full medical and damage control teams on board and they were offered to the USS Cole. When accepted, she did what she could.” Sir John remarked with a smirk.
Angelique gave us a quick warning glance as did “Lemon Balm.” HMS Marlborough was called after a famous ancestor of the Arch Liar, the 1st Duke of Marlborough, one John Churchill. These days HMS Marlborough serves with the Chilean Navy, they bought her and she is known as Almirante Condell. I reluctantly held back a nasty comment on the ship, she did good work, excellent in helping a comrade in need. I respect that as much as I detest Sir John, the old goat.
“Why would that not bother you? Surely if a terrorist attack by way of rubber ducks or small ski-boats against a commercial vessel takes place, you as a counter terrorism expert should be concerned?” Captain Thomas asked.
I looked toward Angelique as senior officer to explain and she did. “We are not overly concerned with a ship sinking offshore where no one except the crew and the terrorists die. I know this sounds harsh and it is harsh, but in my line of work we worry more about civilian casualties, hostages and serious damage caused to the innocents. Such a sinking will have almost zero propaganda impact for the terrorists. I am sorry to say, Captain Thomas, but we do consider some lives to be more important than others...”
“The major security problem we face today is stopping the USS Cole type of attack. There is nothing preventing such small boats circling a cruise ship and sinking it. This is not a hostage / hijacking scenario, this is murder, pure and simple. They want to sink the targeted ship, not capture and sail it to a harbour which is another concern. This is the difference between them and pirates, the pirate does not wish to sink the ship as such, he wants money for releasing it. The terrorist wants to use it as a weapon, either propaganda or of mass destruction or both. Mrs Dawson will brief you on that scenario, I am sure.”
I took a brief pause, before concluding. “And you mentioned ski-boats earlier, Captain Thomas, I am glad you did. We use ski-boats here, in this theatre instead of rubber ducks. We found that rubber ducks or zodiacs as they are called are close to useless in our oceans for Special Operations work. They have no range, are easily shot out, give no protection against the elements and will be swamped in our waves when launching or landing on a beach. The ski-boats, we have several in service ourselves and they can be found everywhere, can carry up to 5-tons of high grade military explosives at 40 plus knots. They have radar, sonar, long distance radios and other offensive equipment on board as standard. Using them in a terrorist role, I am tempted to guarantee you, if I was a terrorist, I would sink any US aircraft carrier with a couple of them, they will not stop me and with enough shaped charges that carrier will go down. This is not an idle threat, we worked out how to do so in great detail. The aircraft carriers are in no way geared for war, they last went to a shooting war, I am not talking of aircrew flying combat missions, but shooting against the vessel itself, in the Second World War. Their laxness can be seen how the ships are constructed, they are painted on the inside. When the Pacific War started, all the naval ships, including the aircraft carriers, removed tons and tons of paint to prevent fires. Today those lessons were forgotten and they are painted merrily to serve as a floating hotel almost. There is nothing dangerous on working on a flight deck either, just a daily job you are trained to do and get paid to do. It cannot begin to be the same as a grunt patrol in enemy territory.” (Taken from Code Name Caribbean.)
This is a long blog, I doubt if many will read it or read this far – the ban on electronics is long overdue in aircraft. Such a device, if filled with Semtex or C-4, will bring an aircraft down. The risk and threat is very real and the decision is applauded. If you cannot afford my books but want to read them to learn more, contact me, I will help you with electronic copies.
I have a picture in my possession, it is on my Facebook page for you to admire, of two fellows, white men, in their twenties I suppose, neatly dressed as is the US beggar fashion, with a sign card: “Need cash to kill Donald Trump.” This was taken very recently in San Francisco, California, and came to my attention via a GMJ reader. In most countries in the world the picture would be seen as hate speech, not covered by freedom of speech and a punishable offence. In some countries, those two would have been arrested and interrogated for weeks, and then jailed for threatening a President. Sadly, some liberals, most actually, will state that this is freedom of speech in motion and explain that anything else is Nazism, deplorable and God knows what else - I usually stop listening when they open their mouths but there is a clear pattern here which is worrying from a counter terrorism view.
I have had numerous reports, yes, readers write to me despite my warning that my emails are intercepted by their intelligence communities, stating that they were present where snowflakes, liberals and Demorats (what we call Democrats in GMJ Books, they don’t like that) expressed sincere wishes that someone will kill, murder, shoot, President Donald J Trump. It goes further, one Madonna, after her offer to give free blow-jobs to all willing to vote for Hilarious failed (we call Hillary R Clinton “Hilarious” in our books, she is), stated that she wished that she could blow up the White House, presumably with explosives. Another, a rapper, released a video recently, he aims a pistol at an effigy looking remarkably like the current US President and then pulls the trigger – a joke? Artistic flavour? Not to be taken too seriously? Freedom of Speech? Of course, that is the excuse besides “public interest.” At that point, we read of the US Secret Service being unable to protect the President against anything but a loner & lunatic trying his luck. This is a subject often mentioned in GMJ Books as I stated many times that a dedicated enemy Special Forces Team will get past the US Secret Service rather easily but let me quote something from Code Name Wrangler, a book on hostage rescues that is used as a training manual in some Police Departments (I am told):
“ …. The 14,5 x 114 mm is in effect the Warsaw Pact answer to the West’s .50 “ma deuce” caliber. It is bigger though and substantially so. It will create more damage and it is a mother coming in several ammunition types from the original armour-piercing incendiary anti-tank round to more modern armour-piercing incendiary full metal jacket round with a hardened steel core. This was the one Angelique loaded together with incendiary tracer rounds in the five-round magazine. She could have used armour-piercing incendiary tracer full metal jacket round with a steel core or high-explosive incendiary bullet. Mike Delta Three Eight had them all and a special one I have never seen before, specially made depleted uranium designed to knock holes the size of a man’s fist through B6+ level armour. It would punch the hell out of an aircraft’s windows never mind the thin aluminium body.
The muzzle break on any Truvelo is Gucci, something to admire as it is flat (like the Barrett) and exceptionally large, it needs to be. One of the private tests we have, when we observe someone shooting a sniper rifle, is to see where the shooting mat is placed. If used to lie on, we know, another wannabee in his fake camouflage uniform and we see them often on YouTube. The shooter is typically obese and has a beer belly, most certainly he is unable to carry that rifle further than ten yards without dying of a heart attack. A true sniper will lie on whatever, mud, slime, blood and what have you, such things do not bother him but the dust rising from the floor or ground underneath the barrel, with every shot, bothers him terribly indeed. It should, it betrays his position and hence the mat is placed in front of the barrel, even if you fire from deep inside a darkened room or through a little hole twenty yards away (not a new technique at all, we used in 1984 already), you don’t want dust betraying you. Here, on the Triggerfish was no dust and yet they insisted on the mat being placed there, in front of the barrel. You go through the same shooting cycle and you never deviate unless you have to, that is how you become and stay a good sniper. Never relax your standards, never take it easy and in your stride and always strive for more. If you don’t have that kind of outlook we don’t want you, you will never pass my tests.
We also see them, the wannabees, conducting shows on reality based (an oxymoron if ever) television. They are hilarious and should be watched for entertainment value only. A few years ago we had a television show being filmed at our shooting range on the Ukuthula Ranch. The idea was to see how to destroy the US President’s armoured vehicle or not, I am not sure they wanted to succeed. Why such things are fascinating to the public I would not know, killing a president is not nearly as effective as killing a counter terrorism or spy head. The Big Turd can be replaced by the system within a second and with no great loss either. Anyway, they made reproductions of the vehicle, of the doors to be precise, guessing from videos on the armour levels required.
It was of course, just so much nonsense as they turned the door at a 30-degree angle before shooting its four-inch-thick armoured window with a .50 Barrett, using a standard FMJ (full metal jacket) round, leftovers from World War Two. The round did not penetrate, hallelujah, success! Then they decided to test the fuel tank by placing it on the ground, an IED (a very small one) below it, and set it off, the fuel tank went several yards in the air, hallelujah, success. And so it went on. When they shot the lower part of the door, one inch hardened armoured steel, with an incendiary round, there was a large flame for a second, it sure looked impressive. Oh wow, hallelujah, success! We started sniggering openly, Geelslang and I just could not stop laughing and attracted attention from the director.
The Director / Producer queried why we were amused and I told him he was being taken for a ride. The tests were nonsense (I used a better word, I assure you). At this the so called “expert” got decidedly unhappy and stood closer talking such crap in explaining that I stopped him to ask a few questions myself and what should have been asked before they arrived. I asked the first guy where he served in the military, if ever. Turns out he was a US Marine, a mechanic, to be precise and had some very vague knowledge on the workings of an M4 assault rifle. He had never even fired a Barrett before that day. The second one was a former armour officer driving a main battle tank who had worked as a glorified security guard for the “First US Tattoo Brigade” (Blackwater to you, we saw them in Iraq). The third one did not even answer, we were now smirking too much. I am sure he was something clerical and I don’t mean a man from God. All of them had the “Marine help me look strong” haircut and none had any idea on conducting small operations behind enemy lines where you most certainly will shoot a president if you can. I was so astonished I ran out of words and looked at Geelslang for help.
Geelslang then took over and tried to be kind. “Okay, now tell me, lad, this fuel tank, is it attached to the Big Turd’s car in real life? Yes? Then why a test where it is not attached? What are your proving? Surely that is a silly test now! Don’t worry, Foxtrot here knows something of explosives and will show you what to do. Let us have a real-life test and see what happens.”
He was much nicer than me but a nice Geelslang is a dangerous bastard at the best of times. I took the remaining fuel tank and placed a couple of very large stones on it, ensuring it could not imitate a bird, and used exactly half of the original explosives and blew it to kingdom come. And I did not cheat, I even left a space, of about eight inches between the tank and the explosives to simulate the car’s height above the ground. Their faces were something to see as the fuel tank burned merrily, failure with a capital F but a silly test. The fuel tank should be surrounded by armour (they did not think of that) in real life. But then, IED devices are growing in size and any decent one will hammer the “Beast” as the presidential limousine is called, to pieces. When playing with shaped charges it will be destroyed and easily so, an MRAP vehicle would be a much better choice for him to travel in. According to one former US Secretary of Defence, Dr Robert Gates, the MRAP vehicles are better protected in armour than an Abrams tank. They are not as great as some believe.
Angelique then arrived with Colonel Annaud, her Frog Minder in tow. She heard the explosions and felt cheated out of the fun, no doubt and had the remaining fake door placed upright, not at a cheating 30-degree angle and shot right through it with the Barrett. First, she shot it with a standard armour piercing round she brought with (she heard the Barrett also and recognised the sound), not the FMJ they used, and then used one with a tungsten core. We knew the depleted uranium ones would do even more damage using that very same Barrett. We had also noted the “experts” could not even hit the target properly. They had some fancy white triangles painted on it and from a hundred yards, unbelievably, they missed as they only hit the sides of the triangle. There is no way that shooting would pass even the most basic of sniper school in a Third World Army, never mind a good one. It was side-splittingly funny and then it got serious. The “experts,” now being humiliated, stated loudly that it does not matter because the vehicle would move rapidly away after the first shot and so the next bullet would never go through the same hole twice. They were harping on their test where the bullet did indeed not penetrate, if you change the angle, it is called sloping armour, it becomes harder to penetrate. This was, as any idiot knows, first made famous on the Soviet T-34 tank and then copied by everyone including the Germans (Panther, Tiger 2). And the “experts” stated, seriously, where would a terrorist get military type ammunitions like armour piercing?
Well, three things, the vehicle would indeed be moving, straight to the morgue. We had already got the turd (we call politicians “turds” in GMJ Books, they float in what they talk) inside when our bullets went straight through but fair enough, we played along. I pointed out and they reluctantly agreed (it is so damn obvious they had to), that the president’s car does not drive on rough terrain where it shakes around, it drives on very level roads, it does not shake when driving. Hence any test means it can move sideways, but not up and down more than a few parts of an inch. I challenged him - choose any one of us four (I included Annaud, a former Legion and French Army Special Forces sniper) standing there, and we will shoot through the first hole on the move, at 30 miles per hour and at 800 yards, not a miserable 100 yards where capture would be certain. Now if he was a real “expert” and not a wannabee, he would have known, the further away the sniper, the better the chance of hitting such a target. The target feels to the shooter like it moves slower than it would when right in front of your nose. It is logical, simple science… look at your commuter train coming in next time you are on the station, it is much faster to you when two feet away than at a fair distance and yet the speed is the same. But the cook did not comprehend this and accepted the challenge as fair. For some reason he chose Geelslang of all people much to Angelique’s obvious disappointment (she was even beaming at him to choose her, he must have been gay to ignore her like that).
Of course, we did this before, Geelslang and I. We shot and killed Angelique’s former boss and wiped his entire protection team out. We knew about the counter assault method first perfected by the US Secret Service, they made documentaries on it (why only they will know). We used our Special Forces background and that is your problem which the wannabees don’t comprehend. Against an idiot like Lee Harvey Oswald and others, your counter assault idea will work (they jump out of their vehicles and storm you, the shooter, distracting you and hopefully, overrun you). Against military professionals waiting for it? Nah, you will die. We simply ambushed the counter assaulters or Geelslang did with a semi-automatic sniper rifle, picking them off one by one and they ran into prepared claymore mines (not used). Not even a Marine infantry platoon, much harder, will get through such an ambush without suffering serious casualties. I shot the bastard at my leisure (Code Name Pour Angelique). Here we rigged the holed door and towed it at a steady 30 miles per hour. Geelslang shot right through that bullet hole twice, the slow action cameras proved it. And his bullets penetrated every time and would have killed whoever was behind it. According to Geelslang and me who had been with him for three decades then, that was not his best shots ever, not even close. And then Angelique’s protection team arrived carrying a Truvelo 20 mm anti-material rifle and well as the Russian .50 (.57) 14.5 mm, she radioed for it. You can guess the rest, the remaining two doors and armour were destroyed as they were never designed to resist that caliber. The usual “OMG it is Montgomery and Patton” brigade failed again by not realising what they may be up against.
The point is this, think like your enemy, always. Put yourself in his shoes and think. It is a stupid argument to say, yeah, where will they get such bullets or rifles? Every Spetsnatz Unit has dozens of exactly such rifles. It is not to say the sniper you are up against will be a deluded fellow with his granny’s hunting rifle. You may be running pall mall into professionals, not wannabees and then what? Oddly, when we saw the television show afterwards, none of our parts were shown to the admiring public, assured the president is safe... (We had fun, Foxtrot, and you threatened the producer with death if my face is shown on his show. They did not want to show failure, Angelique.) …” (taken from Code Name Wrangler)
The point is this, it is a useless exercise to shoot a President. It will not stop the Republican victories and will not even make a difference. In the end, Mr Pence will replace a good American, a decent man, within seconds and carry on with what the American people decided at the election booth. Stop this nonsense of threatening the President before someone is hurt. Donald J Trump was elected, fairly and squarely, there is no doubt. Forget the “Russian Intelligence Involvement” – that was debunked in Code Name Moonlight, read the book or ask me for a copy of the relevant pages, I will gladly give it to you. I cry for my late wife’s country.
George M James is a pseudo name for the author and used for security reasons. He is an expert on counter-terrorism and counterinsurgency operations in sub-Saharan Africa, a military historian and published author of more than 50 books. In the GMJ Series, you will learn about Covert Operations, Special Forces techniques, current political analyses and military history not known outside the select few. Every GMJ Book is based on historical fact and often what is revealed in a GMJ Book is published by the mainstream media a short while later. Many of the GMJ Books are used as training material by Police Forces (SWAT) across the world. Note please that GMJ does not claim to have served in South African Army or Police Special Forces.